<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ADC Documentation Bomb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Sep 2008 15:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GI</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1160</link>
		<dc:creator>GI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 19:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1160</guid>
		<description>It remind me the work made with the 'Concept' Books 15 years ago for NeXTSTEP

Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It remind me the work made with the &#8216;Concept&#8217; Books 15 years ago for NeXTSTEP</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glasspusher</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>glasspusher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>Don't think Carbon gets all the second hand treatment. I'm waiting for Leopard for Cocoa to have APIs to select files based on UTIs. File extensions suck and should be strictly optional. The Carbon folks are ahead of the curve on this one. Ditto for Applescript support, although Cocoa has been getting better with regards to this.

I use them both. I love Cocoa but it doesn't have everything. A little rivalry isn't a bad thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t think Carbon gets all the second hand treatment. I&#8217;m waiting for Leopard for Cocoa to have APIs to select files based on UTIs. File extensions suck and should be strictly optional. The Carbon folks are ahead of the curve on this one. Ditto for Applescript support, although Cocoa has been getting better with regards to this.</p>
<p>I use them both. I love Cocoa but it doesn&#8217;t have everything. A little rivalry isn&#8217;t a bad thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Driftmeyer</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Driftmeyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>(Assuming he's referring to the new guides being Cocoa only)

100% Cocoa: Excellent! 
0% Carbon: Get used to disappointment. Move to Cocoa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Assuming he&#8217;s referring to the new guides being Cocoa only)</p>
<p>100% Cocoa: Excellent!<br />
0% Carbon: Get used to disappointment. Move to Cocoa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1145</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1145</guid>
		<description>Presumably because 0% of the "Completely New" documents are Carbon. My opinion is this should be taken as a sign by people who insist that Carbon is the future of Mac programming. I doubt very much we'll be seeing much "completely new" stuff for Carbon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably because 0% of the &#8220;Completely New&#8221; documents are Carbon. My opinion is this should be taken as a sign by people who insist that Carbon is the future of Mac programming. I doubt very much we&#8217;ll be seeing much &#8220;completely new&#8221; stuff for Carbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Nutting</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Nutting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1137</guid>
		<description>Umm... I just did a quick count.  There are 69 new or updated documents from March 8.  22 of them have Carbon listed in the "Topic" column, and 33 listed Cocoa.  How does that work out to 100% Cocoa or 0% Carbon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; I just did a quick count.  There are 69 new or updated documents from March 8.  22 of them have Carbon listed in the &#8220;Topic&#8221; column, and 33 listed Cocoa.  How does that work out to 100% Cocoa or 0% Carbon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1128</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1128</guid>
		<description>100% English, 0% Esperanto
Very disappointing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% English, 0% Esperanto<br />
Very disappointing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1127</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1127</guid>
		<description>100% Cocoa, 0% Carbon
Very disappointing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100% Cocoa, 0% Carbon<br />
Very disappointing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1120</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1120</guid>
		<description>Oooh, tasty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, tasty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/104/adc-documentation-bomb#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads-up.  Sounds great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads-up.  Sounds great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.537 seconds -->
