<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FastScripts 2.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/194/fastscripts-23/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/194/fastscripts-23</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/194/fastscripts-23/comment-page-1#comment-16775</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/194/fastscripts-23#comment-16775</guid>
		<description>Thanks, ssp. I will look into improving the shell script icons&#039; appearance.

The ability to hide the &quot;Library Scripts&quot; is long overdue, and I&#039;ll let you in on the dirty little secret: it&#039;s not there yet because I have a more ambitious plan. I thought it would be better to give users the option of including or excluding whichever script paths they like. For instance, I sometimes need to use a directory full of testing scripts that are otherwise not applicable. For this reason, I implemented a feature (works today!) that can achieve what you want, but unfortunately it has no UI. This is of course, really silly, and I should add a simple &quot;Hide Library Scripts&quot; option if I&#039;m going to take much longer finishing the more ambitious plan.

For the time being if this feature is important you can set a defaults value from the Terminal. More information in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.red-sweater.com/RedSweater/FSHelp.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;very last item&lt;/a&gt; on the FastScripts FAQ page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, ssp. I will look into improving the shell script icons&#8217; appearance.</p>
<p>The ability to hide the &#8220;Library Scripts&#8221; is long overdue, and I&#8217;ll let you in on the dirty little secret: it&#8217;s not there yet because I have a more ambitious plan. I thought it would be better to give users the option of including or excluding whichever script paths they like. For instance, I sometimes need to use a directory full of testing scripts that are otherwise not applicable. For this reason, I implemented a feature (works today!) that can achieve what you want, but unfortunately it has no UI. This is of course, really silly, and I should add a simple &#8220;Hide Library Scripts&#8221; option if I&#8217;m going to take much longer finishing the more ambitious plan.</p>
<p>For the time being if this feature is important you can set a defaults value from the Terminal. More information in the <a href="http://www.red-sweater.com/RedSweater/FSHelp.html" rel="nofollow">very last item</a> on the FastScripts FAQ page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/194/fastscripts-23/comment-page-1#comment-16742</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/194/fastscripts-23#comment-16742</guid>
		<description>Hm, no way to not display the &#039;Libaray Scripts&#039;? Even Apple&#039;s menu does that.

Also, have a close look at the icons for shell scripts. Somehow they look a lot better in Apple&#039;s menu (perhaps an issue of scaling down the large icon vs using a small design size?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, no way to not display the &#8216;Libaray Scripts&#8217;? Even Apple&#8217;s menu does that.</p>
<p>Also, have a close look at the icons for shell scripts. Somehow they look a lot better in Apple&#8217;s menu (perhaps an issue of scaling down the large icon vs using a small design size?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

