<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FastScripts 2.3.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/344/fastscripts-232/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/344/fastscripts-232</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  6 Jan 2009 23:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Takaaki</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/344/fastscripts-232/comment-page-1#comment-108893</link>
		<dc:creator>Takaaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/344/fastscripts-232#comment-108893</guid>
		<description>Why don't you say you released version 2.3.3? "Update 2: Fixed in 2.3.3." doesn't tell users if you plan to include the fix in the next release or you already released it. I'm saying this because FastScripts doesn't have an auto-updating system built-in.

Anyway, the fix was quick. Thanks for mentioning me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you say you released version 2.3.3? &#8220;Update 2: Fixed in 2.3.3.&#8221; doesn&#8217;t tell users if you plan to include the fix in the next release or you already released it. I&#8217;m saying this because FastScripts doesn&#8217;t have an auto-updating system built-in.</p>
<p>Anyway, the fix was quick. Thanks for mentioning me :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Plaid Cow</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/344/fastscripts-232/comment-page-1#comment-108263</link>
		<dc:creator>The Plaid Cow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/344/fastscripts-232#comment-108263</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear that this has finalyl made it in. :-)

For those that would question why this is a useful feature, I offer up an example from my workflow. I do not mind it when applications store preferences and extar autogenerated files in the Library directory, but for items that I am installing, I think it makes much more sense to keep them out of this heirarchy. SO now I can just make folder aliases into my ~/Projects/AppleScripts/ directory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear that this has finalyl made it in. :-)</p>
<p>For those that would question why this is a useful feature, I offer up an example from my workflow. I do not mind it when applications store preferences and extar autogenerated files in the Library directory, but for items that I am installing, I think it makes much more sense to keep them out of this heirarchy. SO now I can just make folder aliases into my ~/Projects/AppleScripts/ directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.342 seconds -->
