<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web Apps Good Enough (For Developers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers/comment-page-1#comment-113323</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 18:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers#comment-113323</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope Apple just drop Mail from X.5. Not only will that protect us from their HTML stationery, GMail is faster and more reliable anyway…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope Apple just drop Mail from X.5. Not only will that protect us from their HTML stationery, GMail is faster and more reliable anyway…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim DeVona</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers/comment-page-1#comment-113292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim DeVona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers#comment-113292</guid>
		<description>Has all the iPhone fever and furor obscured any interesting WWDC news relevant to development on the actual Macintosh? What I look forward to with each new system revision is not necessarily the glitzy keynotable features but the incremental introduction of new tools under the hood (APIs, scripting languages, libraries, etc. -- things that provide useful services and resources for professional and amateur programmers). I suppose Core Animation qualifies, but is there any other information about what we create with Leopard that has emerged free from NDA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has all the iPhone fever and furor obscured any interesting WWDC news relevant to development on the actual Macintosh? What I look forward to with each new system revision is not necessarily the glitzy keynotable features but the incremental introduction of new tools under the hood (APIs, scripting languages, libraries, etc. &#8212; things that provide useful services and resources for professional and amateur programmers). I suppose Core Animation qualifies, but is there any other information about what we create with Leopard that has emerged free from NDA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Harwood</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers/comment-page-1#comment-113291</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Harwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers#comment-113291</guid>
		<description>Totally agree, Dan! Whilst I was out of the country during WWDC, it seems to me it&#039;s a slightly below-par alternative. Web apps on the iPhone are great, don&#039;t get me wrong, but arguing them as a replacement for local apps on the iPhone seems weak to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree, Dan! Whilst I was out of the country during WWDC, it seems to me it&#8217;s a slightly below-par alternative. Web apps on the iPhone are great, don&#8217;t get me wrong, but arguing them as a replacement for local apps on the iPhone seems weak to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelGregoire</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers/comment-page-1#comment-113287</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelGregoire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers#comment-113287</guid>
		<description>Apple&#039;s really blowing it with the iPhone. Sure, it&#039;s &quot;sexy&quot;... but I&#039;m sure that I&#039;m not the only one who was ready to buy one in an instant until finding out that it wouldn&#039;t be a REAL handheld, á la Palm/Newton. Not for $600.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s really blowing it with the iPhone. Sure, it&#8217;s &#8220;sexy&#8221;&#8230; but I&#8217;m sure that I&#8217;m not the only one who was ready to buy one in an instant until finding out that it wouldn&#8217;t be a REAL handheld, á la Palm/Newton. Not for $600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus Nordlander</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers/comment-page-1#comment-113274</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus Nordlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/355/web-apps-good-enough-for-developers#comment-113274</guid>
		<description>While I do agree that this seems like a very convenient solution for Apple, I am not certain that this is in any way a bad thing for the iPhone. While developing real cocoa apps for the iPhone would be cool, I think this having a real browser on a phone and being able to run web apps is a good thing, and that it opens a lot of opportunities. Different opportunities than being able to run Cocoa apps, but opportunities none the less. 

What Apple at least could have done though, is some way to save a bookmark in the home menu, which accesses the page without an address bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I do agree that this seems like a very convenient solution for Apple, I am not certain that this is in any way a bad thing for the iPhone. While developing real cocoa apps for the iPhone would be cool, I think this having a real browser on a phone and being able to run web apps is a good thing, and that it opens a lot of opportunities. Different opportunities than being able to run Cocoa apps, but opportunities none the less. </p>
<p>What Apple at least could have done though, is some way to save a bookmark in the home menu, which accesses the page without an address bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

