<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WebKit&#8217;s New Element Inspector</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:36:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-121924</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 06:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-121924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firebug also has much more advanced Javascript debugging features, which WebKit has some of in Drosera, which I hope will be integrated with WebKit / Web Inspector more closely.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firebug also has much more advanced Javascript debugging features, which WebKit has some of in Drosera, which I hope will be integrated with WebKit / Web Inspector more closely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-121720</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-121720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Webkit inspector is very much, albeit with fewer features, a clone of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getfirebug.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Firebug&lt;/a&gt; which is the preeminent web developers friend in Firefox. Two major advantage that firebug has over webkit inspector is the ability to edit styles in-line and see them applied to the whole page and the ability to dynamically display changes to the DOM as they happen. I think that it is a good thing that WKI is copies Firebug so closely. Now I only need to learn one tool to do debugging in two different browsers. I look forward to WKI&#039;s continuing evolution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webkit inspector is very much, albeit with fewer features, a clone of <a href="http://www.getfirebug.com/" rel="nofollow">Firebug</a> which is the preeminent web developers friend in Firefox. Two major advantage that firebug has over webkit inspector is the ability to edit styles in-line and see them applied to the whole page and the ability to dynamically display changes to the DOM as they happen. I think that it is a good thing that WKI is copies Firebug so closely. Now I only need to learn one tool to do debugging in two different browsers. I look forward to WKI&#8217;s continuing evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-121509</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-121509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I would be wholeheartedl for is them simply opening up hooks in the Inspector to allow people to get/inject new CSS. 

Then you could inspect an element and open just that CSS in CSS Edit or Coda and update it

That might be interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I would be wholeheartedl for is them simply opening up hooks in the Inspector to allow people to get/inject new CSS. </p>
<p>Then you could inspect an element and open just that CSS in CSS Edit or Coda and update it</p>
<p>That might be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-121442</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-121442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zac: I don&#039;t really see it as bulking up, but I take your point. I think when something reads and displays something beautifully, it&#039;s a natural extension to expect it should be able to write it, too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zac: I don&#8217;t really see it as bulking up, but I take your point. I think when something reads and displays something beautifully, it&#8217;s a natural extension to expect it should be able to write it, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-121437</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-121437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CSS Edit (http://macrabbit.com/cssedit/) does allow you to edit the CSS code of a website in the application. Its quite simple to get it to preview a page and then start to edit the CSS code in CSS Edit to see effective live updates as you edit the code.

It not the same as you are suggesting but I would rather have this sort of functionality in a full CSS editor than see it in a DOM inspector. 

Bulking up utilities like that seems to be a Windows sort of thing to do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSS Edit (<a href="http://macrabbit.com/cssedit/" rel="nofollow">http://macrabbit.com/cssedit/</a>) does allow you to edit the CSS code of a website in the application. Its quite simple to get it to preview a page and then start to edit the CSS code in CSS Edit to see effective live updates as you edit the code.</p>
<p>It not the same as you are suggesting but I would rather have this sort of functionality in a full CSS editor than see it in a DOM inspector. </p>
<p>Bulking up utilities like that seems to be a Windows sort of thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-121423</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-121423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, how about this, CSSEdit uses webkit, if you just tell CSSEdit to use the nightly, you can use the web inspector in CSSEdit&#039;s Preview window.  This means that you can have it all in one app.  Although not in one screen.  I suppose if there is the functionality to get this information out of webkit to display then, MacRabbit, could also whip up the functionality to show what properties have been overridden.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, how about this, CSSEdit uses webkit, if you just tell CSSEdit to use the nightly, you can use the web inspector in CSSEdit&#8217;s Preview window.  This means that you can have it all in one app.  Although not in one screen.  I suppose if there is the functionality to get this information out of webkit to display then, MacRabbit, could also whip up the functionality to show what properties have been overridden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens Ayton</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-119270</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Ayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-119270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Y’know, all those drop shadows/glows on the text is just showing off. :-)

Ryan, you can run a WebKit nightly side by side with the release version of Safari (2.x or 3 beta). Unlike the beta, the nightlies do not replace WebKit for other apps by default.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y’know, all those drop shadows/glows on the text is just showing off. :-)</p>
<p>Ryan, you can run a WebKit nightly side by side with the release version of Safari (2.x or 3 beta). Unlike the beta, the nightlies do not replace WebKit for other apps by default.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssp</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-119254</link>
		<dc:creator>ssp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-119254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought the old Web Kit Inspector was quite impressive (and tremendously useful) already. But this bests it again. The only advantage of the old inspector is its size. While the MacBook&#039;s screen isn&#039;t exactly small, using this inspector while viewing a reasonable part of a page and hopefully seeing some text editor windows as well is &#039;tricky&#039; at least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the old Web Kit Inspector was quite impressive (and tremendously useful) already. But this bests it again. The only advantage of the old inspector is its size. While the MacBook&#8217;s screen isn&#8217;t exactly small, using this inspector while viewing a reasonable part of a page and hopefully seeing some text editor windows as well is &#8216;tricky&#8217; at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Ballantyne</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-119003</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Ballantyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 22:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-119003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forgive me for a bit of lazyness in not checking this out for myself...how does it compare to Firebug? I&#039;ve held out on using the WebKit nightlies simply because I want to develop against the current release version rather than a future version that may be subject to change.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for a bit of lazyness in not checking this out for myself&#8230;how does it compare to Firebug? I&#8217;ve held out on using the WebKit nightlies simply because I want to develop against the current release version rather than a future version that may be subject to change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector/comment-page-1#comment-118962</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/363/webkits-new-element-inspector#comment-118962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would tend to consider the degree of support that is likely to go into the UI Inspector as falling far short of what is available in &lt;a href=&quot;http://macrabbit.com/cssedit/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CSSEdit&lt;/a&gt;, or any other such 3rd party products.

Think of it more like the support for RSS in Safari. It&#039;s really awesome to have it available *everywhere* for free, even though it&#039;s clearly worth spending the extra money for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsgator.com/Individuals/NetNewsWire/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NetNewsWire&lt;/a&gt; and have a better complete experience with syndication.

In general the software industry is about an ever evolving level of &quot;commodity&quot; functionality, on which the salable products are built. Consider WebKit itself which itself makes &quot;HTML rendering&quot; a commodity enterprise, while leaving the door still wide open for competition in the complete browser experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would tend to consider the degree of support that is likely to go into the UI Inspector as falling far short of what is available in <a href="http://macrabbit.com/cssedit/" rel="nofollow">CSSEdit</a>, or any other such 3rd party products.</p>
<p>Think of it more like the support for RSS in Safari. It&#8217;s really awesome to have it available *everywhere* for free, even though it&#8217;s clearly worth spending the extra money for <a href="http://www.newsgator.com/Individuals/NetNewsWire/" rel="nofollow">NetNewsWire</a> and have a better complete experience with syndication.</p>
<p>In general the software industry is about an ever evolving level of &#8220;commodity&#8221; functionality, on which the salable products are built. Consider WebKit itself which itself makes &#8220;HTML rendering&#8221; a commodity enterprise, while leaving the door still wide open for competition in the complete browser experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.red-sweater.com @ 2013-06-19 20:54:41 by W3 Total Cache -->