<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Use This?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<pubDate>Wed,  7 Jan 2009 13:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sjk</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133634</link>
		<dc:creator>sjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133634</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;What do you think?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
That it's already a significant improvement. :)

The "release" date is the most obvious thing missing from the compact listing.  Similar to MU/VT, that would be useful to me for simple by-date item grouping though still not as useful an indicator for when developers actually add/update their software as it is on MU/VT.

I can send you more detailed feedback about that and other issues directly instead of further hijacking's Daniel's space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>What do you think?</p></blockquote>
<p>That it&#8217;s already a significant improvement. :)</p>
<p>The &#8220;release&#8221; date is the most obvious thing missing from the compact listing.  Similar to MU/VT, that would be useful to me for simple by-date item grouping though still not as useful an indicator for when developers actually add/update their software as it is on MU/VT.</p>
<p>I can send you more detailed feedback about that and other issues directly instead of further hijacking&#8217;s Daniel&#8217;s space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus Ramberg</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133574</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus Ramberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133574</guid>
		<description>Hi. 
Thanks for useful feedback. We're trying out an alternative layout at http://osx.iusethis.com/compact/ 

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.<br />
Thanks for useful feedback. We&#8217;re trying out an alternative layout at <a href="http://osx.iusethis.com/compact/" rel="nofollow">http://osx.iusethis.com/compact/</a> </p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sjk</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133557</link>
		<dc:creator>sjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133557</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;IUseThis wastes valuable front page real estate w/ excessively long app descriptions&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yeah, information on the iUseThis main page has been worthless to me compared to the more compact product summaries on MacUpdate and VersionTracker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>IUseThis wastes valuable front page real estate w/ excessively long app descriptions</p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, information on the iUseThis main page has been worthless to me compared to the more compact product summaries on MacUpdate and VersionTracker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ted</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133544</link>
		<dc:creator>ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 15:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133544</guid>
		<description>I like iUseThis, but I find MacUpdate more useful. Mainly because w/ MacUpdate, I can see two days worth of new releases. With iUseThis, I see 6 entries per page. And I have to click on the link to see just New Releases. IUseThis wastes valuable front page real estate w/ excessively long app descriptions. Those should be saved for the detail page, not the home page.

But I really admire the guys at IUseThis, and champion their support of the Mac community. I find myself tied in to them via their RSS feed, but still check MacUpdate constantly, almost like they are serving crack. 

Competition is good though. Remember the days when VersionTracker was the only game in town for Mac apps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like iUseThis, but I find MacUpdate more useful. Mainly because w/ MacUpdate, I can see two days worth of new releases. With iUseThis, I see 6 entries per page. And I have to click on the link to see just New Releases. IUseThis wastes valuable front page real estate w/ excessively long app descriptions. Those should be saved for the detail page, not the home page.</p>
<p>But I really admire the guys at IUseThis, and champion their support of the Mac community. I find myself tied in to them via their RSS feed, but still check MacUpdate constantly, almost like they are serving crack. </p>
<p>Competition is good though. Remember the days when VersionTracker was the only game in town for Mac apps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133525</link>
		<dc:creator>Mo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 15:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133525</guid>
		<description>This almost makes me wish I'd only started being so diligent with my iusethis, uh, flags (I guess?) a few days ago :) (Mind you, MarsEdit 2 is easily worth the money)

Congratulations Nick!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This almost makes me wish I&#8217;d only started being so diligent with my iusethis, uh, flags (I guess?) a few days ago :) (Mind you, MarsEdit 2 is easily worth the money)</p>
<p>Congratulations Nick!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133518</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133518</guid>
		<description>Michael: probably a bit of everything. Definitely a lot of it is public image, which is shaped by public behavior. For all ya'll know I'm a subsidiary of Microsoft. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: probably a bit of everything. Definitely a lot of it is public image, which is shaped by public behavior. For all ya&#8217;ll know I&#8217;m a subsidiary of Microsoft. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133517</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133517</guid>
		<description>At what point does an indie software developer become a not-indie software developer, I wonder?  Is it based on number of employees?  Annual revenue?  Organization type (corporation or other)?  Public versus private?  Venture versus privately funded?  Or just the cool factor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At what point does an indie software developer become a not-indie software developer, I wonder?  Is it based on number of employees?  Annual revenue?  Organization type (corporation or other)?  Public versus private?  Venture versus privately funded?  Or just the cool factor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133515</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133515</guid>
		<description>This is why I like smaller companies!

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I like smaller companies!</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133513</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133513</guid>
		<description>i like the idea, too! ;) 
thanks for this amazing software!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i like the idea, too! ;)<br />
thanks for this amazing software!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerome</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this/comment-page-1#comment-133512</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/398/do-you-use-this#comment-133512</guid>
		<description>I must say that I like that idea, pretty cool. :)  Damn if only I went to say i used MarsEdit sooner!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that I like that idea, pretty cool. :)  Damn if only I went to say i used MarsEdit sooner!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.699 seconds -->
