<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Storie Di Apple Interviews Drew Thaler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/433/storie-di-apple-interviews-drew-thaler/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/433/storie-di-apple-interviews-drew-thaler</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Gable</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/433/storie-di-apple-interviews-drew-thaler/comment-page-1#comment-134371</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Gable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/433/storie-di-apple-interviews-drew-thaler#comment-134371</guid>
		<description>&quot;iPod&quot; is not a great name for a music-player, but it&#039;s a fine name for a convergent-device, because it&#039;s not warped-up in any one function.    The last time I flew, I saw almost as many people watching an in-flight movie on their iPod as listening to music with it.

By contrast, &quot;iTunes&quot; is a great name for a music-player, but it&#039;s a lousy name for something that you buy movies and games from.  &quot;iPlayer&quot; might be better for that, but it&#039;s so ... generic and uninspiring.  Good names are hard.

If the function-specific name &quot;iPhone&quot; is eventually dropped, in favor of &quot;iPod Phone&quot;, or just &quot;iPod&quot;, then I think it&#039;s safe to say the name was a success.  Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;iPod&#8221; is not a great name for a music-player, but it&#8217;s a fine name for a convergent-device, because it&#8217;s not warped-up in any one function.    The last time I flew, I saw almost as many people watching an in-flight movie on their iPod as listening to music with it.</p>
<p>By contrast, &#8220;iTunes&#8221; is a great name for a music-player, but it&#8217;s a lousy name for something that you buy movies and games from.  &#8220;iPlayer&#8221; might be better for that, but it&#8217;s so &#8230; generic and uninspiring.  Good names are hard.</p>
<p>If the function-specific name &#8220;iPhone&#8221; is eventually dropped, in favor of &#8220;iPod Phone&#8221;, or just &#8220;iPod&#8221;, then I think it&#8217;s safe to say the name was a success.  Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pauldwaite</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/433/storie-di-apple-interviews-drew-thaler/comment-page-1#comment-134326</link>
		<dc:creator>pauldwaite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/433/storie-di-apple-interviews-drew-thaler#comment-134326</guid>
		<description>Yup. Doesn’t suggest music. Doesn’t really mean anything. Brings little to mind except Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.

And yet, it worked. I think because it recalls the successful iMac, and it’s two syllables.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup. Doesn’t suggest music. Doesn’t really mean anything. Brings little to mind except Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.</p>
<p>And yet, it worked. I think because it recalls the successful iMac, and it’s two syllables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

