<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixels Are Hot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/506/pixels-are-hot/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/506/pixels-are-hot</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/506/pixels-are-hot#comment-139672</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=506#comment-139672</guid>
		<description>Meh.  I tried out a couple of the early Iris betas, but they had a lot of problems, flaws, and glitches that made it feel more like an alpha product.  I went to Nolobe's blog to download the completed version of Iris and...

404 Error
The requested URL /iris-10.dmg was not found on this server.

Brilliant.  Wunderbar.  Hmmm....  Went to the main Iris page and finally downloaded a real copy.

Some of the glitches had been smoothed out, yet I am not impressed with this.  It still feels very minimal, doesn't offer too much, yet they are asking $79 for this?!  Sorry, but Pixelmator and Acorn offered much more out of the gate, and at a lower cost.  Here are a couple of problems I'm finding with Nolobe's Iris:

1) There are already several other applications out there named Iris.  This causes for confusion, and could perhaps even lead to a lawsuit.
2) Would it be asking too much to have tool tips appear when my mouse hovers over a button?
3) Where's the beef?  Feature-wise, this application just isn't there yet.  And considering that it requires Leopard to run it, that will cut out people who are still using Tiger (which works perfectly well, thank you).
4) No Help or other documentation.

Image editors is an area I've had an eye on for a number of years.  As Photoshop has continued getting larger and more expensive, I have had my eye out for a lower-end image drawing and editing program, including trying to design my own.  Pixelmator and Acorn came out last year, which answered my call, and I have copies of both.  However, Iris seems to have garnered far too much attention so early in the game and it just doesn't seem that it has baked long enough.

But in the spirit of competition, a healthy fight between a few strong competitors should only make them stronger.  ATI and nVIDIA continually push each other.  Aperture and Lightroom keep going back and forth.  In the end, we can all win -- it doesn't need to be a zero sum game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh.  I tried out a couple of the early Iris betas, but they had a lot of problems, flaws, and glitches that made it feel more like an alpha product.  I went to Nolobe&#8217;s blog to download the completed version of Iris and&#8230;</p>
<p>404 Error<br />
The requested URL /iris-10.dmg was not found on this server.</p>
<p>Brilliant.  Wunderbar.  Hmmm&#8230;.  Went to the main Iris page and finally downloaded a real copy.</p>
<p>Some of the glitches had been smoothed out, yet I am not impressed with this.  It still feels very minimal, doesn&#8217;t offer too much, yet they are asking $79 for this?!  Sorry, but Pixelmator and Acorn offered much more out of the gate, and at a lower cost.  Here are a couple of problems I&#8217;m finding with Nolobe&#8217;s Iris:</p>
<p>1) There are already several other applications out there named Iris.  This causes for confusion, and could perhaps even lead to a lawsuit.<br />
2) Would it be asking too much to have tool tips appear when my mouse hovers over a button?<br />
3) Where&#8217;s the beef?  Feature-wise, this application just isn&#8217;t there yet.  And considering that it requires Leopard to run it, that will cut out people who are still using Tiger (which works perfectly well, thank you).<br />
4) No Help or other documentation.</p>
<p>Image editors is an area I&#8217;ve had an eye on for a number of years.  As Photoshop has continued getting larger and more expensive, I have had my eye out for a lower-end image drawing and editing program, including trying to design my own.  Pixelmator and Acorn came out last year, which answered my call, and I have copies of both.  However, Iris seems to have garnered far too much attention so early in the game and it just doesn&#8217;t seem that it has baked long enough.</p>
<p>But in the spirit of competition, a healthy fight between a few strong competitors should only make them stronger.  ATI and nVIDIA continually push each other.  Aperture and Lightroom keep going back and forth.  In the end, we can all win &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t need to be a zero sum game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serhei</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/506/pixels-are-hot#comment-139431</link>
		<dc:creator>Serhei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=506#comment-139431</guid>
		<description>I think this is why it's better to wait until the initial App Store rush blows over before taking good stock of how well your iPhone app is going to do. Right now, a large portion of your "success" depends on luck - did you get into the beta? Is the app going to be ready by July 11? Is there an ADA app that "competes" with yours (and if so, should you worry about whether it'll affect your ability to get your app seen)? There's just too many ways right now you could get discouraged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is why it&#8217;s better to wait until the initial App Store rush blows over before taking good stock of how well your iPhone app is going to do. Right now, a large portion of your &#8220;success&#8221; depends on luck - did you get into the beta? Is the app going to be ready by July 11? Is there an ADA app that &#8220;competes&#8221; with yours (and if so, should you worry about whether it&#8217;ll affect your ability to get your app seen)? There&#8217;s just too many ways right now you could get discouraged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/506/pixels-are-hot#comment-139394</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=506#comment-139394</guid>
		<description>Glad to see someone cast competition in a more positive light! It's troubling to hear people speak negatively about it, because there should be nothing wrong with developers competing. When you are passionate about your app, when you are trying to build the best possible product, then competition doesn't matter. You're there to realize &lt;em&gt;your&lt;/em&gt; vision, not copy someone else's. And I don't think anyone can find fault with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see someone cast competition in a more positive light! It&#8217;s troubling to hear people speak negatively about it, because there should be nothing wrong with developers competing. When you are passionate about your app, when you are trying to build the best possible product, then competition doesn&#8217;t matter. You&#8217;re there to realize <em>your</em> vision, not copy someone else&#8217;s. And I don&#8217;t think anyone can find fault with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.252 seconds -->
