<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If Your WordPress Was Hacked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/509/if-your-wordpress-was-hacked/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/509/if-your-wordpress-was-hacked</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donncha O Caoimh</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/509/if-your-wordpress-was-hacked/comment-page-1#comment-143187</link>
		<dc:creator>Donncha O Caoimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=509#comment-143187</guid>
		<description>Thanks for linking to that post, and good talking to you on IRC!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for linking to that post, and good talking to you on IRC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/509/if-your-wordpress-was-hacked/comment-page-1#comment-142144</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=509#comment-142144</guid>
		<description>OK - I sort of knew I was asking for a nitpick when I wrote that :) But I&#039;d like to convey the important point here: if you&#039;re having trouble with 2.5.1 it&#039;s probably because of some insidious residual infection, not because of a new attack which occurred after you updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK &#8211; I sort of knew I was asking for a nitpick when I wrote that :) But I&#8217;d like to convey the important point here: if you&#8217;re having trouble with 2.5.1 it&#8217;s probably because of some insidious residual infection, not because of a new attack which occurred after you updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/509/if-your-wordpress-was-hacked/comment-page-1#comment-142126</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=509#comment-142126</guid>
		<description>&quot;which is supposed to be free of vulnerabilities&quot;

I think it&#039;s naïve to think that ANY piece of software is free from vulnerabilities.
Thanks for the link though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;which is supposed to be free of vulnerabilities&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s naïve to think that ANY piece of software is free from vulnerabilities.<br />
Thanks for the link though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
