<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Lifts iPhone Developer NDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 22:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: foggydave</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146903</link>
		<dc:creator>foggydave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146903</guid>
		<description>@Joel...

There seems to be some confusion about this -- perhaps Apple should have worded their statement more clearly. It seems clear to me that the continued NDA will apply *not* to unreleased apps that *you* are writing, but unreleased versions of the iPhone software (OS, firmware and SDK seeds) that come down to developers from Apple.

You can talk about the projects you are working on to your heart&#039;s content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joel&#8230;</p>
<p>There seems to be some confusion about this &#8212; perhaps Apple should have worded their statement more clearly. It seems clear to me that the continued NDA will apply *not* to unreleased apps that *you* are writing, but unreleased versions of the iPhone software (OS, firmware and SDK seeds) that come down to developers from Apple.</p>
<p>You can talk about the projects you are working on to your heart&#8217;s content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146901</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146901</guid>
		<description>The way the statement was worded leaves me wondering whether developers can discuss technical problems on Cocoa-dev.  The notice talks about released iPhone software.  The thing that has kept me from doing anything with the iPhone SDK has been the inability to ask questions.  I don&#039;t see how this solves my dilemma.  Do you have any thoughts on this Daniel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way the statement was worded leaves me wondering whether developers can discuss technical problems on Cocoa-dev.  The notice talks about released iPhone software.  The thing that has kept me from doing anything with the iPhone SDK has been the inability to ask questions.  I don&#8217;t see how this solves my dilemma.  Do you have any thoughts on this Daniel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146900</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather apple not arbitrarily reject apps...

I&#039;ve been working on my current app for a month.
It uses non-&quot;standard&quot;  UI components.
What happens if it gets rejected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather apple not arbitrarily reject apps&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been working on my current app for a month.<br />
It uses non-&#8221;standard&#8221;  UI components.<br />
What happens if it gets rejected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146898</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146898</guid>
		<description>for dropping an utterly stupid policy,
i would suggest an action far short of
&quot;lavish praise&quot;, like &quot;commendation&quot;...

i&#039;d reserve &quot;praise&quot; for the cases where
the correct choice is made at the outset,
and &quot;lavish praise&quot; for those fewer cases
where that choice required courage too.

unless we&#039;re dealing with children, that is,
small children, who should always be told
they are wonderful, even when they&#039;re not.

but you&#039;re right, maybe that&#039;s just me...

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>for dropping an utterly stupid policy,<br />
i would suggest an action far short of<br />
&#8220;lavish praise&#8221;, like &#8220;commendation&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>i&#8217;d reserve &#8220;praise&#8221; for the cases where<br />
the correct choice is made at the outset,<br />
and &#8220;lavish praise&#8221; for those fewer cases<br />
where that choice required courage too.</p>
<p>unless we&#8217;re dealing with children, that is,<br />
small children, who should always be told<br />
they are wonderful, even when they&#8217;re not.</p>
<p>but you&#8217;re right, maybe that&#8217;s just me&#8230;</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146896</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146896</guid>
		<description>To those who don&#039;t think positive change deserves praise, I guess we just don&#039;t see the world through the same lens.

No amount of misbehavior will damage my ability to recognize and appreciate a meaningful, positive change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To those who don&#8217;t think positive change deserves praise, I guess we just don&#8217;t see the world through the same lens.</p>
<p>No amount of misbehavior will damage my ability to recognize and appreciate a meaningful, positive change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146895</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146895</guid>
		<description>&quot;lavished with praise&quot;?

for dropping an utterly stupid policy?

yeah, right.

you&#039;re funny, daniel, you&#039;re really funny.

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;lavished with praise&#8221;?</p>
<p>for dropping an utterly stupid policy?</p>
<p>yeah, right.</p>
<p>you&#8217;re funny, daniel, you&#8217;re really funny.</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon W.</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146894</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146894</guid>
		<description>I respectfully disagree that Apple deserves an iota of praise for this move.  The iPhone epitomizes &quot;defective by design&quot;: the AT&amp;T exclusive, the &quot;very sweet solution,&quot; the NDA that &lt;a&gt;got a book canceled&lt;/a&gt;, the App Store exclusive, and the arbitrary rejections.  This press release demonstrates Apple&#039;s perspective: &quot;steal our work,&quot; &quot;hundreds of patents,&quot; &quot;ripped off by others.&quot;  Android was a kick in the ass, or an Apple suit finally got around to reading the dBase chapter of &lt;i&gt;In Search of Stupidity&lt;/i&gt;; either way, Apple didn&#039;t do this for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree that Apple deserves an iota of praise for this move.  The iPhone epitomizes &#8220;defective by design&#8221;: the AT&amp;T exclusive, the &#8220;very sweet solution,&#8221; the NDA that <a>got a book canceled</a>, the App Store exclusive, and the arbitrary rejections.  This press release demonstrates Apple&#8217;s perspective: &#8220;steal our work,&#8221; &#8220;hundreds of patents,&#8221; &#8220;ripped off by others.&#8221;  Android was a kick in the ass, or an Apple suit finally got around to reading the dBase chapter of <i>In Search of Stupidity</i>; either way, Apple didn&#8217;t do this for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul D. Waite</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/614/apple-lifts-iphone-developer-nda/comment-page-1#comment-146893</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul D. Waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=614#comment-146893</guid>
		<description>Phew. Definitely makes iPhone development more attractive for the aspiring indie crowd.

Now, if they can just nail down the App Store inclusion policy, we’ll really be cooking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew. Definitely makes iPhone development more attractive for the aspiring indie crowd.</p>
<p>Now, if they can just nail down the App Store inclusion policy, we’ll really be cooking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
