<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve Been Macbroken</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/620/ive-been-macbroken/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/620/ive-been-macbroken</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/620/ive-been-macbroken/comment-page-1#comment-146910</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=620#comment-146910</guid>
		<description>Cool stuff.  I will check out the podcast later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool stuff.  I will check out the podcast later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: britt</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/620/ive-been-macbroken/comment-page-1#comment-146908</link>
		<dc:creator>britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=620#comment-146908</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been listning to MBW (and 99% of the rest of the TWiT podcasts) for years now, and CI since you and Manton started putting it out. I haven&#039;t heard a bad episode of either yet. Hearing Austin was great, too (I&#039;ve owned a copy of X-Plane since before it used OpenGL -- ver 5???).

Once upon a time, I worked at Apple, too... and I can state from experience, that those people DO need outside perspectives to keep them grounded in reality. Actually, once *anybody* gets isolated from their customers, loosing their way gets real easy - perhaps inevitable.


I&#039;m not a lawyer either, but... from my read of the NDA, it only covers information that&#039;s not &quot;public&quot; -- given the number of people that are now talking about it, I would guess that a good argument could be made that the SDK is now public knowlege (although, I have always thought that since anybody could download the SDK for free, an argument could be made that it always was public. However, I really don&#039;t want to have to be the one making that argument to a judge!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been listning to MBW (and 99% of the rest of the TWiT podcasts) for years now, and CI since you and Manton started putting it out. I haven&#8217;t heard a bad episode of either yet. Hearing Austin was great, too (I&#8217;ve owned a copy of X-Plane since before it used OpenGL &#8212; ver 5???).</p>
<p>Once upon a time, I worked at Apple, too&#8230; and I can state from experience, that those people DO need outside perspectives to keep them grounded in reality. Actually, once *anybody* gets isolated from their customers, loosing their way gets real easy &#8211; perhaps inevitable.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a lawyer either, but&#8230; from my read of the NDA, it only covers information that&#8217;s not &#8220;public&#8221; &#8212; given the number of people that are now talking about it, I would guess that a good argument could be made that the SDK is now public knowlege (although, I have always thought that since anybody could download the SDK for free, an argument could be made that it always was public. However, I really don&#8217;t want to have to be the one making that argument to a judge!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/620/ive-been-macbroken/comment-page-1#comment-146907</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 21:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=620#comment-146907</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Daniel! I&#039;m actually really pleased that Leo is including other people in the MacBreak Weekly podcasts because it stops them from getting stale and a bit predictable.

Here&#039;s hoping that you are asked back again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Daniel! I&#8217;m actually really pleased that Leo is including other people in the MacBreak Weekly podcasts because it stops them from getting stale and a bit predictable.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s hoping that you are asked back again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/620/ive-been-macbroken/comment-page-1#comment-146906</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=620#comment-146906</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not so sure about that, Peter. I believe a public statement of NDA-lifting is sufficient to open the floodgates. It is a technique for NDA-lift clarification that Apple has used before.  I guess we&#039;re not lawyers, but in any case I think you&#039;re right that Apple will not be busting anybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about that, Peter. I believe a public statement of NDA-lifting is sufficient to open the floodgates. It is a technique for NDA-lift clarification that Apple has used before.  I guess we&#8217;re not lawyers, but in any case I think you&#8217;re right that Apple will not be busting anybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hosey</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/620/ive-been-macbroken/comment-page-1#comment-146905</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hosey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=620#comment-146905</guid>
		<description>&gt; A particularly well-timed (or poorly-timed, depending how you look at it) topic was that of the iPhone developer NDA, which we discussed a bit, carefully tip-toeing around any actual violation of the NDA, which was still in effect when we recorded, but was lifted a day later.

Not exactly.

The NDA has not been lifted yet; the announcement was that they&#039;re going to. As the announcement puts it, “Developers will receive a new agreement without an NDA covering released software within a week or so.”

Until then, the NDA is &lt;em&gt;technically&lt;/em&gt; still in effect. (I have my doubts that Apple will bust anyone who violates it at this point, but that&#039;s not the same as the NDA truly going away.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; A particularly well-timed (or poorly-timed, depending how you look at it) topic was that of the iPhone developer NDA, which we discussed a bit, carefully tip-toeing around any actual violation of the NDA, which was still in effect when we recorded, but was lifted a day later.</p>
<p>Not exactly.</p>
<p>The NDA has not been lifted yet; the announcement was that they&#8217;re going to. As the announcement puts it, “Developers will receive a new agreement without an NDA covering released software within a week or so.”</p>
<p>Until then, the NDA is <em>technically</em> still in effect. (I have my doubts that Apple will bust anyone who violates it at this point, but that&#8217;s not the same as the NDA truly going away.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
