<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Impatience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience</link>
	<description>Mac &#38; Technology Writings by Daniel Jalkut</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Sweater Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Universal Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Sweater Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Universal Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-684</guid>
		<description>[...] In addition to more tangible features, both FastScripts and Clarion are now Universal - tested on a Core Duo iMac. To Apple&#8217;s credit, I spent more time getting to the iMac (I don&#8217;t own one yet - waiting impatiently for the MacBook Pro) than I did testing or fixing bugs. The only issue encountered turned out not to be an Intel issue at all, but rather a gcc 4.0 bug fix that causes a serious incompatibility with some gcc 3.3 code. Everything else &#8220;just worked.&#8221; Go Apple! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In addition to more tangible features, both FastScripts and Clarion are now Universal &#8211; tested on a Core Duo iMac. To Apple&#8217;s credit, I spent more time getting to the iMac (I don&#8217;t own one yet &#8211; waiting impatiently for the MacBook Pro) than I did testing or fixing bugs. The only issue encountered turned out not to be an Intel issue at all, but rather a gcc 4.0 bug fix that causes a serious incompatibility with some gcc 3.3 code. Everything else &#8220;just worked.&#8221; Go Apple! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-573</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;On the other hand, the little card slot has plenty of bandwidth, and could conceivably support a card with two FW800 ports&lt;/i&gt;...

Fair enough. And as soon as someone actually manufactures a FW800 Express Card, then that may be less of an issue...at least for some people (not for me; I want it on the motherboard, so I can use the card slot for other things).

However, conceiving of such a card doesn&#039;t mean the card exists today. At least as far as I can find, no one manufactures &lt;strong&gt;any&lt;/strong&gt; Express Card slot devices today. So anyone who buys a MacBook will have a slot that&#039;s useful in theory, but may not be useful in practice for many months. No thanks.

I find this especially infuriating in light of two developments: the stories I heard from both Apple employees and from Oxford Semiconductor&#039;s rep at the show that FW800 had been left off specifically because Intel fought with Apple, and Apple caved to get the product out in time; and the FUD comment earlier this week from a Gartner analyst (quoted in an eWeek article about Intel&#039;s Apple group) that Apple needed to use commodity Intel motherboards in order to capitalize on economies of scale. To me, this suggests that Intel thinks Apple&#039;s just another clone company, who&#039;ll buy whatever crap Intel can shovel out their doors.

...&lt;i&gt;(though I’m not sure how they’d handle the connectors)&lt;/i&gt;...

Probably with a dongle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>On the other hand, the little card slot has plenty of bandwidth, and could conceivably support a card with two FW800 ports</i>&#8230;</p>
<p>Fair enough. And as soon as someone actually manufactures a FW800 Express Card, then that may be less of an issue&#8230;at least for some people (not for me; I want it on the motherboard, so I can use the card slot for other things).</p>
<p>However, conceiving of such a card doesn&#8217;t mean the card exists today. At least as far as I can find, no one manufactures <strong>any</strong> Express Card slot devices today. So anyone who buys a MacBook will have a slot that&#8217;s useful in theory, but may not be useful in practice for many months. No thanks.</p>
<p>I find this especially infuriating in light of two developments: the stories I heard from both Apple employees and from Oxford Semiconductor&#8217;s rep at the show that FW800 had been left off specifically because Intel fought with Apple, and Apple caved to get the product out in time; and the FUD comment earlier this week from a Gartner analyst (quoted in an eWeek article about Intel&#8217;s Apple group) that Apple needed to use commodity Intel motherboards in order to capitalize on economies of scale. To me, this suggests that Intel thinks Apple&#8217;s just another clone company, who&#8217;ll buy whatever crap Intel can shovel out their doors.</p>
<p>&#8230;<i>(though I’m not sure how they’d handle the connectors)</i>&#8230;</p>
<p>Probably with a dongle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hendry</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hendry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-571</guid>
		<description>&quot;If it’s 500MHz, it’s not an iBook G4. &quot;

Also, I don&#039;t think the G4s were offered without a DVD player.

I, too, am using a 500 MHz G3 iBook, and placed my order for the new Book on keynote day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If it’s 500MHz, it’s not an iBook G4. &#8221;</p>
<p>Also, I don&#8217;t think the G4s were offered without a DVD player.</p>
<p>I, too, am using a 500 MHz G3 iBook, and placed my order for the new Book on keynote day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hendry</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hendry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-570</guid>
		<description>&quot;But given the history of 1.0 releases (and personally, I’m really pissed off that they left the FW800 port off)&quot;

On the other hand, the little card slot has plenty of bandwidth, and could conceivably support a card with two FW800 ports (though I&#039;m not sure how they&#039;d handle the connectors).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But given the history of 1.0 releases (and personally, I’m really pissed off that they left the FW800 port off)&#8221;</p>
<p>On the other hand, the little card slot has plenty of bandwidth, and could conceivably support a card with two FW800 ports (though I&#8217;m not sure how they&#8217;d handle the connectors).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-568</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-568</guid>
		<description>Daniel, thanks for the Script Editor tip for launching Terminal.  I&#039;ll keep it in mind in case I need it some day.

Oh, and I&#039;ll add my thumbs up to the Target Disk mode approach.  I used it at work a few months ago to install OS X on a G3 tower (I think) that didn&#039;t have a DVD drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, thanks for the Script Editor tip for launching Terminal.  I&#8217;ll keep it in mind in case I need it some day.</p>
<p>Oh, and I&#8217;ll add my thumbs up to the Target Disk mode approach.  I used it at work a few months ago to install OS X on a G3 tower (I think) that didn&#8217;t have a DVD drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volker</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>Volker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-567</guid>
		<description>iBook TargetDisk mode installation: Works like a charm. Had to install a PowerBook with a non functional superdrive (due to car rolling over the PB). Did take 15 minutes or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iBook TargetDisk mode installation: Works like a charm. Had to install a PowerBook with a non functional superdrive (due to car rolling over the PB). Did take 15 minutes or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 07:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-558</guid>
		<description>Well, probably. But given the history of 1.0 releases (and personally, I&#039;m &lt;i&gt;really pissed off&lt;/i&gt; that they left the FW800 port off), I&#039;d wait for the second-gen, even if it takes six months.

Anyway, that&#039;s my own plan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, probably. But given the history of 1.0 releases (and personally, I&#8217;m <i>really pissed off</i> that they left the FW800 port off), I&#8217;d wait for the second-gen, even if it takes six months.</p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my own plan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-556</guid>
		<description>Peter: You&#039;re absolutely right. I am so out of date I&#039;ve undersold my out of dateness! I&#039;m working with a G3 500Mhz iBook. Do I deserve a MacBook or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter: You&#8217;re absolutely right. I am so out of date I&#8217;ve undersold my out of dateness! I&#8217;m working with a G3 500Mhz iBook. Do I deserve a MacBook or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Adler</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-555</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Adler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-555</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s 500MHz, it&#039;s not an iBook G4. The G3s are 300-900MHz (clamshell: 300-466, rectangular 500-900), while the G4s are 800MHz-1.42GHz. The overlap is at 800MHz, where there are both 12&quot; G3 and G4 models; the G4 models say &quot;iBook G4&quot; conveniently on the bottom of the display.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s 500MHz, it&#8217;s not an iBook G4. The G3s are 300-900MHz (clamshell: 300-466, rectangular 500-900), while the G4s are 800MHz-1.42GHz. The overlap is at 800MHz, where there are both 12&#8243; G3 and G4 models; the G4 models say &#8220;iBook G4&#8243; conveniently on the bottom of the display.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Jalkut</title>
		<link>http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/88/intel-impatience/comment-page-1#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Jalkut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.red-sweater.com/blog/?p=88#comment-553</guid>
		<description>I had a chance to spend a few hours today with an Intel iMac with Xcode installed. (If you&#039;re reading, thanks again!).  All of my products now &quot;check out&quot; with the encoding problem worked-around. But there were a few other changes I wanted to make before releasing updates, so I think I&#039;ll probably head to the Apple Store one final time to do a &quot;sanity check&quot; before releasing them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a chance to spend a few hours today with an Intel iMac with Xcode installed. (If you&#8217;re reading, thanks again!).  All of my products now &#8220;check out&#8221; with the encoding problem worked-around. But there were a few other changes I wanted to make before releasing updates, so I think I&#8217;ll probably head to the Apple Store one final time to do a &#8220;sanity check&#8221; before releasing them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

